Next Generation Emulation banner

The Official Benchmark and Comparison Thread!

77K views 396 replies 75 participants last post by  -StrikE- 
#1 ·
Ok! After talking with Demigod. I decided it'd be an excellent chance to do some benchmark and comparisons. The purpose of this thread is to flex the mighty E-pen0s. Well that and its just good fun and comparison. Also an excellent place to discuss various benchmarks and there reflection of current hardware.


Rules


1: When posting your scores and benchmarks. Be sure to post your system settings when taking the bench.

2: Be honest about your image settings! Level of Detail, Performance Mipmaps ect!

3: Try and use widely available benchmarks so its possible to compare! All for ingame benchmarks but they dont usually create reproducable results across various machines.


Some starting benchmark choices


3dmark01SE
3dmark03
3dmark05
Aquamark
Doom 3 Timedemo
Aquamark
Final Fantasy XI benchmark
CodeCreatures
PCmark


There is definately more software out there but these are just few comparable ones that come to mind! Let the benching begin! :smash:
 
See less See more
#3 · (Edited)
Catalyst 5.4, Via Hyperion 4.56. All default driver settings (high quality LOD), no FSAA/Aniso, default said bench program options, system as shown in sig. Probably would be a tiny bit better had this been a clean install.. I haven't formatted in almost a year, and have went through a lot of different HW. I do however keep my drivers/Windows very clean, so it could also be worse. :p

Will do more later & update this post. :)

1) Prime 95 10ms-59ms.

2) 5250 PCMark 04.

3) 18838 3DMark 01.

4) Vana'Diel Bench 3 High Resolution - 4225. Can't take a shot.. it comes out as "FFXi Quit." :???:

5) 48,663 Aquamark 3.

 
#5 ·
Well, here's my 3DMark03 score. It's not anything compared to Chrisray's SLI rig but... I'm.. happy with it... *goes to the corner :cry: *

Also took PCMark04 and AquaMark scores

High Quality

Driver: 66.93
 
#6 · (Edited)
ChrisRay said:
Cool. Can you make your independent tests visible for your benchmarking scores? Like 3dmar2k1 I mean and PCmark.
Yeah, I'll retake them later on and post the independent results. :)

I'm also ordering a new board from Newegg tomorrow (Refurbished GIGABYTE GA-8IG1000PRO-G 865G/ICH5).. going with an 865G based board because it's always nice to have onboard video as a backup, and it's the same as the 865PE.. not to mention Gigabyte's Dual Bios feature, gigabit LAN, 1394, etc. :) I'll prolly push my CPU back up to 3.80GHz again as I had it with my Albatron PX865PE Pro (ASRock's boards are not a bit OC friendly) and rebench.
 
#11 ·
Here is a PSX emulation related benchmark. Petes Framebuffer benchmark results:

Code:
Frontbuffer reading speed (back)
---------------------------------

Format: 01 - Speed:  37.29 Mpix/s  111.87 MB/s

Format: 02 - Speed:  37.8652 Mpix/s  151.461 MB/s

Format: 03 - Speed:  37.9396 Mpix/s  113.819 MB/s

Format: 04 - Speed:  38.2075 Mpix/s  152.83 MB/s



Frontbuffer reading speed (front)
---------------------------------

Format: 01 - Speed:  37.6177 Mpix/s  112.853 MB/s

Format: 02 - Speed:  37.6614 Mpix/s  150.645 MB/s

Format: 03 - Speed:  38.0546 Mpix/s  114.164 MB/s

Format: 04 - Speed:  38.0327 Mpix/s  152.131 MB/s
 
#12 ·
Got my new mobo in the mail today, and it's wonderful. Overclocks better than any board I've had and has tons of tweaking options. :)

Gonna hit 3.8 and I'll rebench everything..
 
#14 ·
Heh, yeah D.D., haven't been able to get a 120MM.. but I will one day, I promise! :p Anyone notice my 1337 SpiderMan temporary tattoo on the side of my case window? I got it from a box of fruitsnacks.. you'd be suprised how good temporary tattoos are for PC decorations. On the case material they're almost impossible to get off.. not really temporary. :D

Can't get 3.8GHz stable with anything under 1.7V (I'm trying to stay under 1.7V for the CPU because of S.N.D.S..) but 3.66GHz is perfectly stable @ 1.6V. I'll rebench and post my results at 3.66 later on.
 
#15 · (Edited)
So far I've tested with 3DMark 2001 and SPECviewperf 8.01 (trippy and very long benchmark). I'll finish running the other benchmarks tomorrow :). My system specs are in my signature and my video card isn't overclocked. I probably will run through everything again with it clocked at 410/1100. All three graphics optimizations listed in the nVidia driver control panel are disabled. I just noticed how close cooliscool's 2001 score is to mine; they're almost identical oO.

Edit: Added 3DMark 2003/2005, PCMark 2004, and Prime95 results. I forgot to mention I'm running the beta 76.45 ForceWare drivers.

SPECviewperf 8.01 results

---------- SUM_RESULTS\3DSMAX\SUMMARY.TXT
3dsmax-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 16.61

---------- SUM_RESULTS\CATIA\SUMMARY.TXT
catia-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 11.07

---------- SUM_RESULTS\ENSIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
ensight-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 11.66

---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
light-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 9.930

---------- SUM_RESULTS\MAYA\SUMMARY.TXT
maya-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 18.35

---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROE\SUMMARY.TXT
proe-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 14.31

---------- SUM_RESULTS\SW\SUMMARY.TXT
sw-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 12.06

---------- SUM_RESULTS\UGS\SUMMARY.TXT
ugs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 4.465
 
#16 · (Edited)
21205 in 3DMark '01 with my new mobo and my CPU @ 3.7GHz! High quality driver preference.. same settings as my previous result in this thread. Also a nice new P95 bench result. Not gonna bother with '03 or '05 due to the fact that it would be basically the same as any other rig with a 9800 Pro in it. :p

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8573379
 
#18 · (Edited)
Here's a different one - how fast does Tekken 3 run in MAME without frame limit or frame skipping on your hardware? It's extremely CPU intensive and by nature of the driver optimizations prefers AMD CPUs.. I'm pretty curious to see as to how it fares on everyone's CPUs, as results with T3 are pretty scattered across the board.

68-75 of 60FPS w/o limit. :)
 
#19 ·
Just like the sig says: 3Dmark05 Demo - 2108 (All the defalt settings of the Demo, yes, I am a cheep mofo)

Maby some other Benchmarks later...
 
#20 · (Edited)
3.8GHz! Had to loosen up the RAM timings and raise the vcore, but it's worth it.

Just 200MHz and I'm at the tabooed 4GHz mark.. :drool: I probably won't stay at 3.8 in fear of S.N.D.S.

As far as stability goes, at 1.7V it seems stable; however, that could easily change. ;) Here's some Sandra and Prime95 benches, more to follow.
 
#21 ·
#22 · (Edited)
3DMark00 - 8999 :eyespin:
3DMark01 - 9451
3DMark03 - 6685
3DMark05 - 2860
Aquamark3 - 31851
Final Fantasy XI Official Benchmark Program 2 version 1.0 @ "High" Resolution - 2922
GunMetal Benchmark 1/2 - 35.57/44.51 FPS
fr-025: the.popular.demo @ 1024x768 & quality 3 - 18272 Pop Stones :guitar:

Specs below except the Processor which was running at 1600Mhz at the time.

All tests run using default options (except where noted) :guitar:
 
#23 ·
Got about 14000 points on 3dMark99Max, but I think that was because vSync appeared to be locked on (I disabled it in the drivers, but the FPS counters were all locked at 150FPS)
 
#24 ·
fivefeet8 said:
Here is a PSX emulation related benchmark. Petes Framebuffer benchmark results:

Code:
Frontbuffer reading speed (back)
---------------------------------

Format: 01 - Speed:  37.29 Mpix/s  111.87 MB/s

Format: 02 - Speed:  37.8652 Mpix/s  151.461 MB/s

Format: 03 - Speed:  37.9396 Mpix/s  113.819 MB/s

Format: 04 - Speed:  38.2075 Mpix/s  152.83 MB/s



Frontbuffer reading speed (front)
---------------------------------

Format: 01 - Speed:  37.6177 Mpix/s  112.853 MB/s

Format: 02 - Speed:  37.6614 Mpix/s  150.645 MB/s

Format: 03 - Speed:  38.0546 Mpix/s  114.164 MB/s

Format: 04 - Speed:  38.0327 Mpix/s  152.131 MB/s

You have a link to this one offhand? I'm curious how this does with SLI and PCIE specifically.
 
#25 · (Edited)
3DMark 2000: 21201
3DMark 2001: 16946
3DMark 2003: 9680
I'll put up my 3dMark 2005 score when it finishes downloading. Also, due to various reasons, those are scores at stock CPU speeds with High Quality, before I'd unlocked the extra pipelines and vertex shader. These are all the default benchmarks

The Framebuffer reading app is avaliable here
Here are my results with the extra pipelines/shader units enabled:
Frontbuffer reading speed (back)
---------------------------------

Format: 01 - Speed: 132.776 Mpix/s 398.328 MB/s

Format: 02 - Speed: 143.065 Mpix/s 572.26 MB/s

Format: 03 - Speed: 160.039 Mpix/s 480.117 MB/s

Format: 04 - Speed: 158.248 Mpix/s 632.99 MB/s



Frontbuffer reading speed (front)
---------------------------------

Format: 01 - Speed: 140.771 Mpix/s 422.314 MB/s

Format: 02 - Speed: 147.216 Mpix/s 588.863 MB/s

Format: 03 - Speed: 159.493 Mpix/s 478.478 MB/s

Format: 04 - Speed: 157.417 Mpix/s 629.67 MB/s

edit: How the hell are my results pissing all over FF8's? He's got a sodding 6800U. Even with 4x/16x enabled my results crush his:

Frontbuffer reading speed (back)
---------------------------------

Format: 01 - Speed: 98.9594 Mpix/s 296.878 MB/s

Format: 02 - Speed: 112.319 Mpix/s 449.278 MB/s

Format: 03 - Speed: 122.29 Mpix/s 366.871 MB/s

Format: 04 - Speed: 120.018 Mpix/s 480.073 MB/s



Frontbuffer reading speed (front)
---------------------------------

Format: 01 - Speed: 113.268 Mpix/s 339.804 MB/s

Format: 02 - Speed: 114.863 Mpix/s 459.451 MB/s

Format: 03 - Speed: 125.545 Mpix/s 376.635 MB/s

Format: 04 - Speed: 121.263 Mpix/s 485.054 MB/s
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top